New data has revealed some 13% of Australian employers are planning to decrease their level of hiring during the second quarter of 2013. HC talks to the experts on how to HR can navigate the process unscathed.
According to new statistics from March of this year, 13% of Australian employers are planning to decrease their level of hiring during the second quarter of 2013.
The Manpower Employment Outlook Survey (MEOS) data coincides with broader economic and political trends which can be seen in the rate of unemployment rising to 5.6% while the number of both full-time and part-time jobs in the economy fell by over 36,000 – according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).
With the number of redundancies increasing across the country and across industries, notably with the 500 job losses at Holden last this week, Right Management’s managing director Bridget Beattie told HC that communication remains the key during times of restructure. The response is certainly not limited to HR, and Beattie commented that the organisation’s response needs to be a unified among all of the business leaders and the communication needs to be very proactive. “Honesty is central with as many Q&A type sessions as possible, and just keeping the conversation going in terms of what the vision of the organisation is, what the strategy is, and what their future is within that. Because that’s the key thing employees want to know. ‘Where do I fit in’ ‘Do I still have a job?’ ‘Are there any more cuts planned?’ – those are the sorts of questions that need to be answered,” Beattie said.
Redundancies can have a significant impact on companies’ productivity levels and reputation, and there are major risks to the business if these conditions and events are managed poorly. Pattie Walsh of employment law firm DLA Piper said the best way to avoid legal hot water in times of redundancy, is by focusing on 3 key strands of the equation:
Walsh emphasised that the communication to those left at the end of a restructure needs to be managed as closely as the legal risks. “I think there’s so much at stake in terms of how you motivate the people left behind after a restructuring and how they feel about the way you’ve handled the restructure, and your internal and external communications around the message of what you’re doing are so important – if you haven’t got that right, it’s a bit like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube,” Walsh said.
