Company penalised for contravening Fair Work Act

The organisation was ordered to rectify the underpayment, plus interest

Company penalised for contravening Fair Work Act

The operator of The Old Cop Shop has been penalised $22,050 in Court for failing to comply with a Compliance Notice issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Apart from the penalty, the Federal Circuit Court ordered The Old Cop Shop Eatery Pty Ltd to rectify the underpayment of the food and beverage attendant plus interest.

The Court found that The Old Cop Shop Eatery Pty Ltd contravened the Fair Work Act by failing to comply with a Compliance Notice requiring it to calculate and back-pay alleged underpayments of a former employee, aged 21.

Ombudsman Sandra Parker said the outcome reinforced the importance of Compliance Notices in helping inspectors recover wages for underpaid workers.

Read more: Underpayment of MCG workers leads to hefty fine

“Compliance Notices are an important tool we use to get unpaid wages back into workers’ pockets in a timely manner. If employers do not comply with Compliance Notices, they can face court-imposed fines in addition to the initial wages back-payment bill,” said Parker.

“We encourage any workers with concerns about their pay and entitlements to contact us for free assistance.”

Fair Work Inspectors conducted an investigation into The Old Cop Shop following a request for assistance from the employee.

Read more: Fair Work Ombudsman crackdown on employee underpayment

The Compliance Notice was issued after a Fair Work Inspector conducted an investigation and formed a belief that the restaurant, between April and June last year, had underpaid the employee’s minimum wage rate for ordinary hours, casual loading, and penalty rates for Sunday and public holiday work under the Restaurant Industry Award 2010.

Judge Heather Riley found that the contravention was deliberate, The Old Cop Shop had not displayed any co-operation, contrition nor taken any corrective action, and the affected worker was young and vulnerable.

Judge Riley said that general deterrence was “a significant factor in this case, given that the restaurant industry is notorious for underpayments to staff”.