Is your company guilty of treating someone with a criminal history unfairly?

A conviction can become spent if:

• an individual is crime free and not in prison for 10 years as an adult;
• there is a finding that an offence has been proved, or that a person is guilty of an offence, but there is no conviction (for example, the offender is put on a good behaviour bond, intervention program, or other Court conditions);
• there is an order of the Children’s Court dismissing a charge and administering a caution; or
• the conviction is of an offence that has ceased, by operation of law, to be an offence.

Under the Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW), individuals with spent convictions are not required to disclose any information regarding their spent conviction, and they do not need to refer to their prior conviction as a conviction for the purposes of character or fitness tests. Therefore, employers may not even be aware of the conviction during the recruitment process. However, if employers do become aware of a prior conviction that is now spent, there are obligations regarding how that person is to be treated.

Irrelevant criminal record

Spent convictions, and convictions that have not been spent and still appear on an individual’s criminal record may constitute an “irrelevant criminal record” and fall under the definition of discrimination for the purposes of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) (the “AHRC Act”) and the Australian Human Rights Commission Regulations 2019 (Cth) (the “AHRC Regulations”).

Both the AHRC Act and the AHRC Regulations do not define an “irrelevant criminal record”, but it is generally understood to mean an individual’s criminal history that does not relate to the employment role or duties.

For example, if a role required a substantial level of integrity and trust, then an individual’s criminal history of dishonesty offences may be considered relevant. However, the same criminal history would be irrelevant for a role that did not require such integrity.

Anti-discrimination obligations

Under the AHRC Act and the AHRC Regulations, any distinction, exclusion or preference on the ground of an irrelevant criminal record will be considered discrimination.

The Australian Human Rights Commission has the power to investigate any act or practice, including any systemic practice that may constitute discrimination and where appropriate try to resolve a complaint of discrimination by conciliation.

Employers need to be wary of any distinction, exclusion or preference on the grounds of either a spent conviction or irrelevant criminal record, during all points of an individual’s employment. This includes the recruitment process, decisions to promote an employee or terminate an employee’s employment and generally regarding terms and conditions of their employment. Employers should also ensure that individuals are not subjected to disparaging comments by other employees regarding their criminal history.

What should employers do?

The AHRC recommends the following procedures:

1. employers should have a written policy and procedure regarding treating people with a criminal history fairly and in accordance with anti-discrimination laws;
2. employers should implement training of staff regarding rights of employees and job applicants to be treated without discrimination; and
3. employers should implement a grievance and complaints procedure for employees if they feel discriminated against.