Developments in external and internal business environments are continuously driving physical workplace changes. Keti Malkoski outlines how to navigate these change drivers.
Developments in external and internal business environments are continuously driving physical workplace changes. Keti Malkoski outlines how to navigate these change drivers.
Anyone who has worked in an office environment for the last decade can attest to the noticeable difference in the workplace of today versus five or 10 years ago – changes in how the workplace looks, feels, and how it operates. And with a robust set of micro and macro forces changing what we do and how we do it, transformations to the physical workplace have only just begun.
Developments in external and internal business environments are continuously driving physical workplace changes. These developments include:
In response to the above change drivers, organisations are adopting flexible or agile ways of working inside and outside of the physical workplace. For workplace change to be effective, organisations need to understand the reasons as to why they are embarking on the change: what are they hoping to achieve and improve from an employee and business perspective?
These reasons feed into the ‘objectives’ of the workplace change which need to be supported by senior leaders and communicated to employees. In a structured change management program, these objectives should also be evaluated to demonstrate the success of the change: objectives relating to the organisation, teams and individual employees.
Below are some examples of objectives identified by organisations that have recently engaged in flexible or agile working:
I recently read a pre and post occupancy evaluation on an organisation that had moved to activity-based-working (ABW) in which increased workforce ‘mobility’ (more employees changing work positions throughout the day) was presented as a positive outcome to the workplace change. In evaluating the success of this ‘outcome’ we must ask ourselves, is increased mobility an actual objective of the workplace change? If so, how can we be sure that it’s related to positive outcomes (e.g. increased movement and collaboration) and not negative outcomes (e.g. increased distractions and feelings of isolation)?
About the author
Keti Malkoski is Workplace Research Psychologist at Schiavello. Her work focuses on enhancing the relationship between employees and the workplace so it can become a value adding tool for work; applying psychology principles to promote user comfort and business effectiveness. Follow Keti via the WorkClimate blog or Twitter: @Kmalkoski