In-house recruitment may save money in the short run, but should this trump all other considerations?
Designing a recruitment approach that is ‘fit for purpose’ was the subject of external recruiter David Whitaker’s recent address at the Auckland District Law Society.
A key focus was the relative merits of in-house and external recruiters. Whitaker, a partner at Saturn Group, made the point that while large companies have the scale to successfully recruit internally, smaller companies may struggle to find the resources.
“I don’t want to be seen to be negative about internal recruiters, because I know a lot of good ones, and I like to think I was a good one … it does work, but only under the right circumstances,” Whitaker said.
Some of the pitfalls of internal recruitment include:
David Whitaker’s point is not that in-house recruitment can’t work, but that people who like what they’re doing and have the time to do it will, most likely, accomplish a better job.
“In-house is good, and that’s the way things are going, but don’t just chuck people in and give your most junior person or most inexperienced person the job, because it will affect you in the long run,” Whitaker said. First of all, the quality of the candidates in the pool will be diminished and, ultimately, your employment brand and business performance may be detrimentally affected.
Whitaker’s advice for recruitment: