Organisations pushing to increase productivity through overtime could be doing more harm than good.
Currently, more than one quarter of employers report their staff are working overtime, with 62% confirming that the extra hours are going unpaid. Although this may be an attempt to increase productivity while keeping headcount down, an expert warns this isn’t the best solution.
For 2013’s Hays Salary Guide, 1,600 employers were surveyed regarding the amount of overtime their staff undertook over the past year. While 11% stated they had been able to reduce the amount of overtime, 63% said it had remained steady. Twenty-six per cent found the amount of overtime to be increasing. In some cases, this was an increase of more than 10 hours per week.
This extra workload on employees runs a high risk of workplace stress and burnout, warned Nick Deligiannis, managing director of Hays in Australia and NZ.
“There could be a very good business case for adding permanent headcount or using a temporary staffing solution instead and there are some fantastic candidates available right now,” Deligiannis said.
Deligiannis warned that the increase in stress and burnout can result in a rise in absenteeism. Coupled with the mental illness caused by burnout, this could cost employers significantly more than they are attempting to save through the overtime.
Key HR takeaways
Occasionally, overtime may be a necessity. As such, Hays suggested a number of methods employers can use to keep engagement high and reduce stress: